14.6.04

LINK: I for one am glad the whole sham-standing issue got shot down, but I like Prof. Volokh's reason better.

Also, I'm no legal guy, but the NYT headline says "Supreme Court Case on Pledge is Dismissed on Technicality," which is true, except that the technicality is that the guy bringing the suit had no right to bring it, which seems like more than a technicality.

No comments: