WELL: Let me see if I get this straight: you heard, from someone who heard it from someone else, that one guy who was associated with other people (whom you can't name), made a proposal to get rid of science in LSA. For a man who puts such an emphasis on the facts leading to truth, there is a definite dearth of the former in your argument. And, anyway, as a decent journalist could tell you, accept nothing as true that cannot be corroborated by two independent, creditable sources.
UPDATE: Even accepting your argument (which I have no reason to do, having none of those other names), it's still pretty much just the word of your professor that this was even being considered--that's a long way from proof.
No comments:
Post a Comment